Self Governance

Proposals Staking
21

I am personally not a fan of separate pools.

  • Get Actual block period equal to day so quoted APY is meaningful in the first place. and -charge penalty on early withdrawal options.
    -Penalties distributed immediately as earned to current stakers

Complexity and and unrealistic “lock-up” periods not the way to go in my opinion.

Especially if going to take away rewards from those doing what they currently doing with staking.

5 Likes
22

good idea to have long term staking at high apy. I think crypto.com has a staking plan for up to 4 years of about 200% APY

1 Like
23

Would the community vote for redenomination of zil?

24

The locking period is to protect our assests. It fine where it is at

1 Like
25

Very well said. You have definitely given this some thought

26

I say as long as is optional and the community or the person has the option to choose that would be fine. as long as it is an option and is not forced. also the higher the APY would be good i also agree that we do have people that are here long term and want to hold for more than 2 to 3 years.

1 Like
27

Interessante, estarei acompanhando mais intenso.

30

It might be interesting to gradually phase out longer staking periods, which would have the effect of reducing some future reckoning day when a bunch of liquidity is unlocked and there is market manipulation by whales around the time the pool expires.

1 Like