# Implement minimum SSN commission fee

**URL:** <https://gov.zilliqa.com/t/implement-minimum-ssn-commission-fee/1320>\
**Category:** Proposals\
**Created:** [November 24, 2022, 10:17am UTC](https://gov.zilliqa.com/t/implement-minimum-ssn-commission-fee/1320 "2022-11-24T10:17:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![will\_speaks](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/7feea3/32.png) [@will\_speaks](https://gov.zilliqa.com/u/will_speaks)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2022, 9:55am UTC](https://gov.zilliqa.com/t/implement-minimum-ssn-commission-fee/1320/18 "2022-11-25T09:55:16Z")

</div>

I thought the idea of SSN commissions were to cover the cost of providing the staking infrastructure and reward those SSN providers who contribute to the ecosystem (through delegation) but I don’t think any SSN provider should be entirely funding their projects in this way - setting a 4% base rate reduces competitiveness for stakers in order to maintain unsustainable business models.

**I would actually argue that both staking rewards and SSN commissions should be reduced!**

As per the whitepaper, Zilliqa was supposed to have transitioned towards reducing block rewards by now (which there is a strong argument for - see this post: [Zilliqa Incentive Layer](https://gov.zilliqa.com/t/zilliqa-incentive-layer/1017) ), which would also reduce the staking rewards and therefore SSN commissions.

So I think projects should be focussing on more sustainable means to bootstrap their development rather than SSN revenues.

I would also suggest that out of miners, SSN providers and stakers, stakers are the least likely of the 3 to sell their portion of the block reward…

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.zilliqa.com/t/implement-minimum-ssn-commission-fee/1320)._
